From collectibles to cars, buy and sell all kinds of items on eBayWelcome! Sign in or register.
aAdvanced Search
Popular products
No suggestions.
JTK AMERICANA INC
Store search
in titles & description
Store categories
Store pages
  • NATIONAL CATHOLIC REGISTER UPDATE

JTK AMERICANA INC   *FAITH*FAMILY*FREEDOM* SITE

 National Catholic Register 

WWW.NCREGISTER.COM   

Bishops Boost Marriage

BY JOAN FRAWLEY DESMOND

BALTIMORE — Over the last five years, the defense of marriage has emerged as a key catechetical, legislative and religious liberty issue for the U.S. episcopacy.

Few bishops understand that better than Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington.

As the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops gathered for its fall general meeting, Archbishop Wuerl had to keep one eye on a same-sex “marriage” bill in Washington that likely will pass early next month.

Public debate on the bill has prompted bitter resistance to any broad exemption for Catholic social institutions with city contracts. City council members have accused the archdiocese of issuing “ultimatums.” Church officials contend that “without a meaningful religious exemption in the bill, Catholic Charities and similar religious providers will become ineligible for contracts, grants and licenses to continue those services.”

When marriage is the topic of debate, the U.S. bishops face a war that must be fought on multiple fronts: theological, cultural and political. No surprise that Archbishop Wuerl — who has defended Catholic teaching in the pages of The Washington Post, in parish bulletins and in public forums — applauds the arrival of the bishops’ new pastoral letter, “Marriage: Love and Life in the Divine Plan.”

“The heart of the pastoral statement is the definition of marriage,” said Archbishop Wuerl. “It is so important for our faithful and for the wide community to understand this; we want to reaffirm this teaching so that people can speak with assurance about marriage. What is it about marriage that makes it unique and important? Why do people follow through with all the effort associated with marriage?”

In 2004, the bishops approved a multilayered pastoral initiative designed to strengthen marriage; the pastoral letter, approved during this month’s meeting, is described as “both an end and a beginning” of this effort.

As the teaching authority of the American hierarchy is increasingly challenged in battles over same-sex “marriage,” Archbishop Joseph Kurtz, chairman of the Subcommittee on Marriage and Family, heralded the letter as a “foundational document” and an “authoritative point of reference.”

The letter addresses marriage’s critical role in the nurturing and education of children; it challenges modern attempts to reduce married love to a “private” couples relationship and warns against the destructive consequences of redefining marriage to include same-sex unions.


Theology of the Body

Chastened by the increasingly skeptical response they have received from younger Catholics in particular, the bishops plan to communicate the central teaching of the pastoral in Web-based campaigns as well as through more traditional catechetical methods. The letter presents marriage as both a “natural institution” and a “Christian sacrament,” and takes note of social science research confirming the essential role of traditional marriage.

“There is a huge need for catechesis on marriage,” confirmed Bishop Richard Malone of Portland, Maine, who helped to lead a repeal of same-sex “marriage” in Maine earlier this month. “Throughout that public debate in the state, I was alarmed by the number of our Catholic people who have a shallow understanding of what marriage is.”

The pastoral letter incorporates the central teaching of Humanae Vitae (The Regulation of Birth) on the unitive and procreative dimensions of conjugal unions. But it also embraces the fresh insights of John Paul II’s theology of the body.

During an era when mass media encourages Americans to shrug off the distinctive characteristics of men and women, and where the young learn to treat the human body as a kind of machine that can be exploited or manipulated at will, the theology of the body offers an integrated vision of the human person. In this teaching, sexual complementarity is a gift to be embraced as the foundation for deep marital communion.

The late Pontiff provided a modern meditation on a fundamental truth: The body expresses the person’s deepest values. Sexual relationships that ignore marital vows of faithfulness, permanence and openness to children violate basic human dignity.

“In drafting the letter, the committee felt that the insights John Paul II made in the theology of the body strengthened the case we can make to people today. Paul VI provided a great foundation, but Humanae Vitae didn’t get the proper catechesis when it was first promulgated,” said Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City, Kan.

The U.S. hierarchy’s initial failure to effectively defend Humanae Vitae is now viewed as a primary reason for ongoing confusion among Catholics about the evils of contraception and — subsequently — the immorality of some reproductive technologies and of same-sex “marriage.”


A New Hunger

Yet, Archbishop Naumann suggests that the past 40 years also have created a new hunger for this teaching.

“We have the experience of the past 40 years. That has given us a lot of empirical data to substantiate the teaching and encourage an openness to the teaching that didn’t exist in the ’60s,” he suggested.

The bishops’ pastoral initiative on marriage may also help to shore up catechetical efforts in states where same-sex “marriage” is already legal. “The pastoral gives us an opportunity to develop a new apologetics,” said Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston. “We don’t hate gays, and we are not trying to deny anyone their civil rights. This is about the defense of marriage.”

The bishops acknowledge that a more intensive effort to present the countercultural elements of Church teaching on marriage is likely to provoke intense resistance not only from homosexual couples seeking social approbation, but also from poorly catechized Catholics.

The pastoral letter addresses a number of sensitive issues — including reproductive technologies that help infertile couples to begin families but violate Catholic teaching. The USCCB also approved a separate document that provides more detailed doctrinal analysis and pastoral reflection on in vitro fertilization, cloning and related procedures.

But bishops who have ministered to infertile couples acknowledge that many are bemused by the Church’s apparent departure from what they define as a pro-child theological tradition.

“I expect that many couples won’t see the need for ethical reflection on reproductive technologies,” said Bishop Salvatore Cordileone of Oakland, Calif., who helped jump-start California’s Proposition 8 ballot measure that led to the repeal of same-sex “marriage” in the state and is eager to bring the pastoral letter to his diocese.

Pushback from dissenting Catholics and political opponents is a given, but during the Baltimore meeting, the bishops appeared both revitalized and resigned as they considered the challenges ahead. Same-sex “marriage” fights appear likely in New Jersey and New York, and many bishops planned to meet with their senators about health-care reform before returning home.

During an afternoon press conference, Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, president of the bishops’ conference, was asked if his colleagues had “regained their political strength.”

“We know many of these issues are both moral and political. Our task is to bring the moral voice to the debate,” responded Cardinal George.

But then he acknowledged that the bishops’ work occasionally influenced the larger public debate, roiling partisan emotions that could fuel a backlash against the hierarchy. “There is something more than Catholic doctrine involved. Some issues are also political, and they draw on loyalties that go beyond Church membership.”

Joan Frawley Desmond filed this report from the U.S. bishops’ meeting in Baltimore.

Big Apple Bishop

BY PAUL BARRA

 

Archbishop Timothy Dolan couldn’t keep it to himself anymore.

Half a year into his tenure as archbishop of New York, he was bothered by widespread anti-Catholicism in the media. So he wrote a column about it and offered it to The New York Times. Most of the examples he cited were found in the pages of the Times.

The newspaper declined the column, saying it doesn’t publish op-ed pieces in response to things in the newspaper.

But Archbishop Dolan has a blog, The Gospel in the Digital Age, and that’s where the column can be found now.

All that was going on when the archbishop, leader of New York’s 2.6 million Catholics, spoke with Register correspondent Paul Barra Oct. 26.

How have your expectations met the realities of life in the Big Apple?

They’ve been extremely happy months so far. I keep repeating myself by thanking the gracious people of the Archdiocese of New York and, indeed, the wider New York community, for their warm embrace. As a Midwesterner growing up in Missouri and having spent the last nearly seven years in Wisconsin, I’m afraid I have to confess that I harbored some caricatures about New Yorkers, falling into the trap of thinking they were icy and aloof and kind of unfriendly. That caricature is about as inaccurate as they get. The people here have just been exceptionally kind. So, the honeymoon is still on, but I feel right at home.

In many ways, culturally and intellectually, New York seems to be secular or a left-wing city, but I’m also pleasantly surprised at how religious it is. First of all, it’s overtly Catholic; people seem to be proud to be Catholic. St. Patrick’s Cathedral is jammed with people praying, and Sunday Masses are filled. There seems to be a sense of confidence in being Catholic and a sense of legitimate pride in being religious. That would almost seem to balance the reputation New York has of being a secular, pagan city.

Cardinal Francis George has appointed you the new moderator of Jewish affairs for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, saying that you are “a friend of the Jewish community who communicates the joy of his own faith, while … conveying profound respect for the spiritual gift of the other.” Is that a good fit for you? You must be busy with Catholic Relief Services.

Since New York is second only to Israel in its number of Jewish citizens, I want to take that with the utmost seriousness. So far, the dialogue, the friendship and the neighborly meetings with the Jewish community have been most inspirational and constructive. So, I’m honored and welcome the new invitation to serve.

I had considered giving up the chairmanship of CRS, although it’s a duty I relish, because of the demands on my time. Then I decided that my role here would give CRS more prominence and publicity, and the executive director, Ken Hackett, said that he still finds me accessible and attentive as chairman of the board to his needs. So far, so good. I look forward to continuing through my last year.

(The CRS Ambassadors program at Cabrini College and Villanova University) is one of our priorities. We want to be able to respond to the numbers of young people who want to give a year or two of their lives in service to the world’s poor in the name of Jesus Christ. We literally cannot keep up with the number who want to serve overseas. One of our goals is to expand (the program).

Does your position as spiritual leader of New York make you a major voice in the USCCB?

Like it or not, I suppose that I am, not because of Timothy Dolan, but because I inherited the cathedra at St. Patrick’s Cathedral; whoever occupies that has more attention rendered to him because of his role as the archbishop of New York. John Paul II referred to New York as the “capital of the world.” And St. Patrick’s is not just a museum or a tourist stop; it’s a real living, breathing, praying church. An Episcopalian friend of mine told me the story of a cab driver who was asked by a fare to be taken to Christ Church. He took him to St. Patrick’s. When the person said, “This is not Christ Church,” the cabbie said, “I don’t know much about religion, but I know that when Christ comes to town, this is where he stays.”

There’s something transcendent, something tangibly pious about the cathedral, situated as it is at Fifth Avenue and Rockefeller Center. The rector, Msgr. Robert Ritchie, opens the vast bronze doors to the street whenever the weather permits, to give the impression that “You’re welcome.” And people will come in and find themselves refreshed and spiritually uplifted from a busy, hectic day.

How do the demands of your ministry affect your own spiritual life, and how would a typical day for the archbishop of New York go?

I concluded a long time ago that to nurture my spiritual life through a good chunk of time in prayer, spiritual reading, reverent celebration of the Mass is not just a hobby, not just a luxury, not just a good idea: That’s essential for survival. And the bigger the challenge that you have in the Church, the more you find yourself on your knees. One of the great gifts I’ve inherited is to have a chapel literally next to my study, so first thing every morning I’m in that chapel. I literally step from my dining room into the magnificent St. Patrick’s Cathedral, so there I offer Mass every morning at 7:30, which is the heart of my day.

I returned to a custom of Cardinal John O’Connor of always offering the 10:15 Mass at St. Patrick’s on Sunday morning. I find that Mass to be particularly exhilarating. You’ve got over 2,000 people there, the choir is superb, the quality of the liturgy is excellent, and it’s a real icon of the Church universal. I try to visit the parishes of the archdiocese on Saturday evening and late Sunday afternoon. So, I say three Sunday Masses on a weekend — what priest doesn’t these days?

What are the big needs that you face in the changing culture of the times, especially the growing popularity of same-sex “marriages” and the battle over conscience clauses for physicians and Catholic hospitals?

Those are burning issues. Recently, we bishops have spoken about the threats that seem to be high in American culture to the whole religious-liberty question, the whole First Amendment question. There’s no denying the fact that there seem to be potent voices in our culture that would like to diminish if not mute the voice of religion and morality in public discourse, not only because we believe heart and soul in truth, but also because America is at her best when people pay attention to morals, to ethics, to religious values.

And, indeed, most of the grand causes in this noble experiment in democracy that we call the United States of America, from the Revolution itself, to anti-slavery, to the peace movement, to the civil-rights movement, to the pro-life movement have all been generated by people’s strong religious faith. To take the voice away, to diminish it, would be to gravely imperil our American experience.

We can’t let that happen. We must ensure that the Church is strong in its defense of its right to speak the truth. We don’t come at these combustible issues merely from religion; we also remind our neighbors and our fellow citizens that this is part of ingrained human reason, and this is part of natural law, of certain inalienable rights that are normative in the American constitutional tradition.

How have you been treated by the exuberant secular New York press?

The press has been exceptionally attentive; they have been interested in what I have to say; they have joined in the chorus of welcome, and I can’t keep up with the requests for interviews and articles and appearances. Now, I know that’s going to take a nosedive sooner or later and, as a matter of fact, as I’m speaking with you now, there are some matters that have been aired in the local press that I feel as a Catholic leader that I must take strong exception to, and intend to do so. As Catholics, we must never pass up an opportunity to catechize.

Paul Barra writes from

Reidville, South Carolina.

Woman Banks on National Shrine

BY JOSEPH PRONECHEN

The double rainbow seen at Mount St. Mary’s University in Emmitsburg, Md., turned out to be pointing to something rarer than the proverbial pot of gold: a woman’s faith and a worker’s integrity.

As a campus groundskeeper raked leaves at the National Shrine Grotto of Our Lady of Lourdes Nov. 9, he struck two bags of gold and silver coins. He immediately brought it to shrine director Bill Tronolone, who knew he had to contact the police to make sure the coins — worth $40,000 — weren’t stolen goods.

The university didn’t have far to go to reunite the life savings with its rightful owner.

Tronolone said Nov. 12 a woman approached him after Mass to ask him, “Did anybody find two bags of coins, my life savings?”

She had to go out of town on an emergency, had a safety deposit box, but knew only one place to trust the rare coins.

“The owner just wanted a safe place to keep her life savings, and in her thinking, ‘What better place than the grotto, right next to the statue of Mary?’” said Tronolone. She told him, “I have great love and trust and devotion in Mary. What better person to leave it with? She would never hurt me.”

Amazingly, she left the money in the open only 10 feet from where thousands of people sit, pray and light candles near our Blessed Mother’s statue at this grotto, built in 1875 by seminarians to honor Mary as Our Lady of Lourdes. Falling leaves covered the bags.

“It’s a miracle nobody saw these bags,” said Tronolone. The other miracle is what he and many others see as great lessons, even though some others thought the woman’s actions were “crazy.”

“It’s about faith and the devotion you have to God in a unique way,” explained Tronolone, pointing out a line in a recent Gospel where Jesus says to leave everything and follow him. “This is basically what this woman did with her life savings. She was putting her money where her faith is.”

The other part is about the integrity of the anonymous groundskeeper.

“Everybody,” the shrine director said, “did the right thing in a very wrong world.”

Linda Sherman, Mount St. Mary’s communications director, who was at the grotto with school officials at a photo shoot, said, “In this time, especially when the economy is down, it’s such a tremendous story of great faith — great faith in the Blessed Mother and in the protection of the Blessed Mother.”

She added, “It’s also very telling of the integrity of the man who found the coins and turned them in immediately.”

The university considers itself blessed to have this gentleman working here.

“This time of year, too, when we’re looking at our blessings, it restores our faith in humanity,” she said. “It gives us hope, and we sure can use a dose of that.”

“God really treats us well,” Sherman said. “He takes care of us in just the way we need to be taken care of.”

Especially when his Mother is involved.

Never Was It Known …’

The Might of the Memorare

BY Joseph Pronechen

 

When Benedictine College needed to raise funds for a Marian grotto on its Atchison, Kan., campus, the college’s president, Stephen Minnis, turned to his “Memorare Army.”

He recruited members for this after considering the story of Blessed Mother Teresa of Calcutta when her newly formed Missionaries of Charity needed money to build their motherhouse. She promised to pray 85,000 Memorares for the Virgin Mary’s help. Needless to say, she got her motherhouse.

“I can recognize a great idea when I see one,” Minnis told the Register. He asked students, faculty, staff, alumni and friends of the college to join the Memorare Army for the cause of Mary’s Grotto. More than 100 people enlisted.

“Before I asked for the money, we had completed pretty close to 100,000 Memorares,” Minnis recalls. This past Sept. 8 — the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary — hundreds attended the official dedication of the finished grotto.

For those who haven’t worked the Memorare into their daily prayers, the next Marian feast — the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, celebrated Nov. 21 — would be an ideal time to start. (For the words of the prayer, see “The Memorare” on page B2.)

Blessed Teresa stands as one of the prayer’s greatest champions. “The Memorare is a prayer that effectively expressed Mother Teresa’s trust in the power of Mary’s intercession as the mediatrix of all graces,” explains Father Brian Kolodiejchuk of the Missionaries of Charity, the postulator of the cause for Blessed Teresa’s canonization. “It flowed from the love and confidence she had in Mary and was a simple way to present her petitions to her. The speedy response she received inspired her with ever greater confidence to have recourse to Mary with the words of the Memorare.”


All Ages

The centuries-old Memorare — its name comes from the prayer’s opening word, which is Latin for “remember” — counts St. Francis de Sales among its most ardent devotees.

As a student experiencing spiritual torments in the 1580s, his problem suddenly disappeared as he knelt in church before a statue of the Blessed Mother imploring her help through the Memorare. After that, he recited the prayer daily. (He would go on to author one of the Church’s most widely studied and beloved devotional books, Introduction to the Devout Life.)

Joe and Megan Wurtz share his zeal for the Memorare. They lived in Virginia when they first learned of Benedictine College’s Memorare Army and joined. Eventually, they moved to Kansas. Joe is now the school’s dean of students.

The decision to relocate came naturally. Devoted to Our Lady, the couple began praying the Memorare together daily while dating. As a married couple, “We have adopted the Memorare as our bedtime prayer,” Joe explains. “The last thing we say to each other before sleep is this prayer.”

The Wurtzes are teaching the Memorare, along with the Rosary, to their young children. And why not? The Memorare is agreeable to Catholics of all ages. Benedictine students kneel for the Memorare after Masses. Among them is sophomore Rachel G’sell, who also prays it nightly at the grotto for a friend stricken with cystic fibrosis, which is presently incurable. She is especially moved by the plea “despise not my petitions, but in thy mercy hear and answer me.”

After two weeks praying this prayer, G’sell spotted a news article about doctors who discovered part of the pathology causing cystic fibrosis. She discussed it with her chemistry teacher, who told her that with the new discovery, a cure could be found in a few years.

“I just ran to the grotto thanking Mary like crazy,” says G’sell. “We’re one step closer to a small miracle.”


Mother Teresa’s Trust

The Memorare Army continues as it successfully campaigns for increasing enrollment, explains Minnis, who credits the Memorare with yet another blessed outcome on that dedication day as rain threatened the outdoor event. Archbishop Joseph Naumann, who was to preside, called to report that it was raining in Kansas City.

Minnis recalls his words: “I know you have devotion to the Memorare, and the campus does. I suggest you pray the Memorare.” That prompted two straight hours of Memorares. Earlier, Minnis specifically requested the rain to hold through 9 p.m. For Mass at 5 p.m., the sun came out. In the evening, everyone strolled for a look at the grotto at night. As they returned inside, it began to rain. Minnis checked his watch. It was exactly 9 p.m.

In one plea for good weather, Mother Teresa had her sisters pray what she called a “flying novena.”

“It consisted of nine Memorares, which she would pray as the need arose or a difficulty presented itself,” Father Kolodiejchuk says. “She definitely inspired the same devotion in her sisters, but also in others.”

He quotes Mother Teresa herself describing one of many instances: “In Rome during the Holy Year (1984), the Holy Father was going to celebrate Mass in the open, and crowds of people were gathered. It was pouring rain, so I told the sisters, ‘Let us say a flying novena of nine Memorares to Our Lady in thanksgiving for beautiful weather.’ As we said two Memorares, it started to pour more rain. We said the third … sixth … seventh … and at the eighth one, all the umbrellas were closing, and when we finished the ninth one, we found all the umbrellas were closed.”

Mother Teresa’s point: When you pray the Memorare, you can trust fully in Mary’s intercession — no matter the circumstances.

Father Kolodiejchuk notes that Blessed Teresa also taught: “Get into that habit of calling on her (Mary). She interceded — at the wedding feast, there was no wine. … She was so sure that he will do what she asks him. … She is mediatrix of all graces. … She is always there with us.”

 Remember, O most gracious

Virgin Mary …

Staff writer Joseph Pronechen is based in Trumbull, Connecticut.


The Memorare

Remember, O most gracious Virgin Mary, that never was it known that anyone who fled to thy protection, implored thy help or sought thy intercession was left unaided. Inspired by this confidence, I fly unto thee, O Virgin of virgins, my Mother. To thee do I come, before thee I stand, sinful and sorrowful. O Mother of the Word Incarnate, despise not my petitions, but in thy mercy hear and answer me. Amen.

Named for the Latin word for “remember,” the Memorare is often mistakenly attributed to St. Bernard of Clairvaux. It was popularized by Father Claude Bernard in the 17th century.

A VETERAN MEETS THE FAITH

BY MATTHEW A. RAREY

 

Veterans Day is coming up, but there are few vets who have a story to tell like Mario Avignone.

His life was changed during World War II when he was stationed near the monastery inhabited by St. Pio of Pietrelcina.

Avignone, a salt-of-the-earth Chicagoan, and two fellow soldiers befriended the stigmatic miracle worker. Since then, he expresses his devotion to the saint by sharing his experiences with others, visiting the sick, and praying with the aid of relics.

After a talk Avignone gave at St. Mary of the Angels Church on the city’s North Side, the 90-year-old veteran, over a meal of salmon and gnocchi cooked by his grandson David, spoke of the saint as if he were in the room. Indeed, his enthusiasm and the relics and other devotionals that adorn his home made the holy man’s presence seem palpable.


How did you meet him?

When I was stationed in Italy at Cerignola [with the 304th Bomb Wing of the 15th Air Force], we were pretty close to Padre Pio’s monastery [at San Giovanni Rotondo]. I knew him for about a year, and after the war, we kept in contact through letters.

But how did I meet him? In 1944 the monsignor there at the church we’d go to by our post could speak a bit of English, and he asked us if we’d ever gotten to see Padre Pio yet. And we asked, “Who is Padre Pio?” So he told us about the stigmata, how he was so popular in Italy.

So the four of us went to the monastery one morning. My buddy Joe served at the Mass with Padre Pio. It was almost two hours long. They say that when he said Mass he was with Christ being crucified. You could see the tears going down his face. Afterward, he spent almost the whole day listening to people’s confessions.


Did you ever see St. Pio after the war?

I told him that it’d be great to come back and bring along my wife and kid. “Don’t waste your money,” he said. “Every time you receive Communion at church, I’ll be at your side.”

But a year or so after he died, in 1968, my wife and I went to pay our respects. When we went to visit his tomb at the church, my wife said I was in ecstasy, tears streaming down my face while I was there at his tomb, kneeling down and praying. She said I was talking out loud, carrying on a conversation with Padre Pio, but she couldn’t hear his voice, just mine. But I could hear his voice. He said he was happy I came to see him.


You could hear him speaking to you? You say it so matter-of-factly.

Nothing surprises me anymore. Not for a long time. Heck, who’d have thought a kid from the South Side of Chicago would end up back in Italy — you know, where my family came from, in the Piedmont — get wounded when a German plane bombed our Liberty ship in the bay in Naples, and end up having a saint as my friend and spiritual father. No, nothing surprises me.


You returned home with relics of St. Pio that seem to have miraculous properties, curing people of terminal illnesses through his intercession. How did you come by them?

Just before we left in ’45, Leo, Joe and I were at the monastery, and they were having a birthday party for Padre Pio. After the party was over, Joe saw one of the monks, Father Ignatius, and told him that we’d like to have something special to remember Padre Pio by. What we really wanted was a piece of one of his bandages that he’d worn over his stigmata.

“Oh, no!” he said. “We don’t give the bandages away. Padre Pio keeps them locked up in his room. What you’re asking me to do is forbidden, and I could get into a lot of trouble.” But we kept talking with him — Joe translating, like always, since his family came from the same part of Italy with the same dialect — and we finally convinced him to get one of those bandages if we promised not to tell anybody — including Padre Pio. He got us one small bandage and divided it in three.

We came back to the monastery not so long after, and Padre Pio stopped us in the hallway. “You naughty boys,” he said, really stern. “You caused one of my brothers to commit sin!”

“Come on, Padre Pio,” says Joe, “what did we do?”

“You know what you did,” he said. “You had Father Ignatius sneak into my room and take one of the bandages and give it to you.”

Nobody told him, but you couldn’t fool Padre Pio. He just knew things, which is why he was such a popular confessor.


When he said this, was he truly angry or saying it with a twinkle in his eye?

Oh, he was serious. But then he shook his head and his face sort of softened. He said to Father Ignatius, “I forgive you, Father. And I forgive you boys, too, but don’t go telling anybody. I wore those bandages over my heart. Go in peace.” And we did.


You say you have helped people over the years by praying with them and putting them in contact with these relics. Do you believe they have worked actual miracles?

Yes. Well, there was the undertaker. He wouldn’t like me to give you his name, but I still see him around the neighborhood. His wife called me up one day, and she was crying. She said, “My husband’s been diagnosed with cancer, and we wonder if you could have him come over and say some prayers to Padre Pio and bless him with the things you’ve got.”

So he came over to my house. We went down to the basement with my little altar there. And we prayed together to Padre Pio to ask him to help cure my friend’s cancer. About 10 days or so later, his wife called me up. She was crying and laughing and told me, “My husband just got home from the doctor and told us the cancer is gone.” And then she asked me, “How can I thank Padre Pio?”

“Don’t thank him, thank God,” I tell her. “He’s his boss.”

Then there was the day a long time ago when a couple came to my house with a baby that was very sick. I didn’t know what I was going to do, not having really done too much of this yet. After all, I’m just a guy who works at the office at the paint factory and just happened to know Padre Pio personally. So we said a prayer to him, and I touched the baby’s forehead with Padre Pio’s bandage. And a couple weeks later, they told me the doc said the baby’s okay.


Why should we know St. Pio?

Of course, there’s nothing in Church teaching saying you’ve got to believe in Padre Pio. When he was alive, a lot of priests in Italy itself resented him. They said he was a fake. They were proven wrong. But why should people know Padre Pio? I guess for the same reason that people know and trust in Christ and our Blessed Mother even though they’ve never met them in person. Padre Pio is powerful, a great intercessor, a friend on our behalf. He changed my life and made most of my 90 years pretty happy since I met him in the war. He brought so many people during his own lifetime back to the Church. And he still does.

Matthew A. Rarey writes from Chicago. Copyright © 2007 Circle Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Anglican Return?

Pope Benedict XVI Opens the Door for Disaffected Anglicans to Come Home

BY Edward Pentin

 

VATICAN CITY — Pope Benedict XVI has paved the way for groups of disaffected Anglicans to come into communion with Rome.

In a historic announcement Oct. 20, the Vatican said the Holy Father has approved canonical structures to allow Anglican clergy and faithful to be received into the Church while retaining elements of their distinctive Anglican spiritual patrimony.

The new structures would be open to members of the Episcopal Church in the United States, otherwise known as TEC (formerly ECUSA); the TEC is the main American branch of the worldwide Anglican Communion. They will also help regularize Pope John Paul II’s 1982 Pastoral Provision, which allowed former Anglicans in the U.S. to come into communion while retaining their Anglican liturgies.

At a Vatican press conference Oct. 20, American Cardinal William Levada, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, announced that an apostolic constitution has been prepared in response to “many requests” from groups of Anglican clergy and faithful wanting to enter into full communion with the Church.

The constitution, which Cardinal Levada said “provides a reasonable and even necessary response to a worldwide phenomenon,” will be a “single canonical model for the universal Church that is adaptable to various local situations and equitable to former Anglicans in its universal application.”

The new canonical structure, which aims to “preserve elements of distinctive Anglican spiritual patrimony,” will be made up of “personal ordinariates.” This means groups of Anglicans won’t be received en masse, but rather that bishops’ conferences around the world will be able to create a special, supraterritorial structure to accept Anglicans under the leadership of a former Anglican minister who would be designated a bishop.

The new structure will allow for married former Anglican clergymen to be ordained. However, in common with Orthodox and Eastern-rite Catholic Churches, married priests will not be allowed to be ordained to the episcopate.

Former married Anglican bishops will also not be allowed to be bishops in the new structure.

These personal ordinariates will be formed, “as needed, in consultation with local conferences of bishops, and their structure will be similar in some ways to that of the military ordinariates that have been established in most countries to provide pastoral care for members of the armed forces and their dependents throughout the world,” Cardinal Levada said.

Cardinal Levada took note of the fact that in recent years, some Anglicans conferred holy orders on women and others have “departed from the common biblical teaching on human sexuality.”

“At the same time,” he added, “as the Anglican Communion faces these new and difficult challenges, the Catholic Church remains fully committed to continuing ecumenical engagement with the Anglican Communion, particularly through the efforts of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity.”

“The provision of this new structure is consistent with the commitment to ecumenical dialogue, which continues to be a priority for the Catholic Church, particularly through the efforts of the Pontifical Council for Promotion of Christian Unity,” the cardinal said.

Archbishop Augustine DiNoia, former undersecretary at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who helped draft the new structure, said: “We’ve been praying for unity for 40 years. Prayers are being answered in ways we did not anticipate, and the Holy See cannot not respond to this movement of the Holy Spirit for those who wish communion and whose tradition is to be valued.”

He said there has been a “tremendous shift” in the ecumenical movement, and “these possibilities weren’t seen as they are now.”

Technical details still need to be worked out, and these personal ordinariates may vary in their final form, Archbishop DiNoia said. Full details of the apostolic constitution will be released in a few weeks, but the Oct. 20 press conference went ahead because it had been planned some time ago, Cardinal Levada said.


‘Not Fishing in the

Anglican Lake’

To underline the importance of this decision, and to perhaps lessen tensions, Archbishop Vincent Nichols of Westminster and Archbishop Rowan Williams of Canterbury held a joint press conference in London Oct. 20.

“The apostolic constitution is further recognition of the substantial overlap in faith, doctrine and spirituality between the Catholic Church and the Anglican tradition,” they said in a joint statement. “Without the dialogues of the past 40 years, this recognition would not have been possible, nor would hopes for full visible unity have been nurtured. In this sense, this apostolic constitution is one consequence of ecumenical dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion.”

The two leaders said they hoped “this close cooperation will continue as we grow together in unity and mission, in witness to the Gospel in our country, and in the Church at large.”

Previously, Cardinal Walter Kasper, president of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, said “there is agreement” between Archbishop Williams and the Holy See that anyone who wishes to be received must have their conscience respected. But Cardinal Kasper stressed “we are not fishing in the Anglican lake” and that ecumenical dialogue “is not aiming to proselytize.”

Breakaway Anglican groups who will benefit from the new structure include the Traditional Anglican Communion, an ecclesial body that claims to have 400,000 members worldwide. Its membership has swelled in the past couple of years, its leadership says, as the Anglican Communion has been torn by issues over homosexual clergy and bishops and the Church of England’s decision to ordain women as bishops.

The Traditional Anglican Communion broke from the Anglican Communion in 1991 over the decision of the Church of England to ordain women as priests. As well as other breakaway groups of traditionalist Anglicans, some of its membership has been hoping for such a canonical structure for at least a decade.

The Traditional Anglican Communion formally made a request two years ago, after all its bishops symbolically signed a copy of the Catechism of the Catholic Church at a ceremony in England.

The discussions that followed were protracted, owing to the unique nature of such a structure, in particular over whether Anglicans should have their own rite.

Archbishop John Hepworth, primate of the traditional body, has played a key role in trying to bring the matter to a conclusion. He will no longer be allowed to be bishop in the new structure, but he has always said he is willing to step aside and let others lead the ecclesial body if such a structure would oblige him to do so.

The apostolic constitution will no doubt be discussed when Archbishop Williams visits the Holy Father and Vatican officials in November.

Edward Pentin writes

from Rome.



The Pope’s Anglican Decision


Even though the Vatican’s momentous decision to approve canonical structures to receive groups of disaffected Anglicans into communion with Rome had been expected for some time, it still came as a surprise.

The Holy See Press Office gave no advance warning of its release until a day before the Oct. 20 press conference. Even the bishops of England and Wales and the archbishop of Canterbury were taken unawares, despite the date of the announcement being fixed as far back as July, according to some sources.

But the high level of secrecy points to concerns at the Vatican about how this decision might play out. Would the Anglican Communion mistakenly see it as poaching disaffected members at a vulnerable time, when it is racked by internal disputes over homosexual clergy and women bishops? How might it affect ongoing ecumenical dialogue? Preparatory talks for the next phase of Catholic-Anglican dialogue (ARCIC III) begin this month.

Yet, as pressure grew from an increasing number of disaffected Anglicans for some kind of permanent structure to accommodate them into the Church, the Vatican felt compelled to act decisively. Every month in India, for example, several Anglican dioceses have been making requests to come into communion, according to traditionalist Anglican sources. Increasing numbers of other traditional Anglican dioceses in Africa and Central America also have been expressing a wish to come into communion.

The need to urgently respond to these requests, therefore, received sympathy from the Catholic bishops in England and Wales. How they feel about the move is important, owing to the central role of the Church of England in the Anglican Communion. Anxious in the past not to upset the established Anglican Church, they have previously been reticent about such a possibility. For example, they rejected similar proposals when many Anglicans came over to Rome following the Church of England’s decision to ordain women as priests in the early 1990s. But this time they were warmer than Vatican officials were expecting.

As American Archbishop Augustine DiNoia, a senior Vatican official who played a key role in drafting the new apostolic constitution, pointed out: A “tremendous shift” in the ecumenical movement has taken place over the past 10 years, and that means these possibilities are viewed differently.


Timely Decision?

Pope Benedict XVI has been firmly behind this decision for a number of years. But the development has met strong resistance from some quarters. Sources say that Archbishop Rowan Williams, the head of the Anglican Communion, was unhappy, but he has put on a brave face regarding the move, saying he did not think it was a “commentary on Anglican problems.” One major practical concern for the Anglican Communion will be the loss of property of those parishes and dioceses which come into communion. The Anglican Communion will lose valuable donations.

But criticism for the decision has also emanated from within the Vatican. Officials at the Vatican’s department for promoting Christian unity conspicuously declined to take part in the press conference, with many concerned that the new structures undermine their dialogue with those Anglicans who remain part of the Anglican Communion. 

Much is still not known about precisely how these new structures will emerge. More work and consultation still needs to be undertaken (the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is to analyze liturgical preferences in December) before the apostolic constitution is published — probably in the coming weeks, according to Cardinal William Levada, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

But, overall, the decision will be seen in many Church quarters as timely, especially as so many traditionalist Anglicans have felt bereft of a church with which they can identify. The decision also comes as Cardinal John Henry Newman is set to be beatified — and has been announced far enough away from the Holy Father’s visit to Britain next fall to remove any chances of clashing with that event.

But perhaps most significantly, it providentially coincides with the renewed focus on liturgical reform. According to the Traditional Anglican Communion, the new English Mass translation matches “word for word” the texts its members already use. In many ways, that’s unsurprising: Traditional Anglican liturgies have long been regarded as “more Catholic” than the Catholic Church’s. This decision can therefore be seen as another facet in Pope Benedict XVI’s efforts to encourage the faithful to rediscover and value the Church’s own rich liturgical history and tradition.

— Edward Pentin

Bishop Nickless: The 'Spirit' of Vatican II is a Demon that Must be Exorcised

BY Tim Drake

I first met Sioux City, Iowa Bishop Walker Nickless a month ago at the Serra International gathering in Omaha, Neb. Little did I know then that he was working on his bold first pastoral letter since his installation as bishop four years ago.

Ecclesia Semper Reformanda (The Church is Always in Need of Renewal), released yesterday, takes a look at the impact of the Second Vatican Council and sets forth a plan for the people of Sioux City and beyond. In many ways, it’s a pastoral letter unlike one we’ve yet seen.

Forty-four years after the close of the Council, Bishop Nickless says there are many questions that still need to be asked and answered.
“Have we understood the Council within the context of the entire history of the Church? Have we understood the documents well? Have we truly appropriated and implemented them? Is the current state of the Church what the Council intended? What went right? What went wrong? Where is the promised “New Pentecost”?

Quoting from Pope Benedict XVI’s address to the Roman Curia in December, 2005, Bishop Nickless draws attention to the two contrary hermeneutics that arose from the Council – one which caused confusion (‘a hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture’), and the other which has borne fruit (‘hermeneutic of reform’).

“The hermeneutic of discontinuity risks ending in a split between the pre-conciliar Church and the post-conciliar Church,” said Pope Benedict.

Bishop Nickless says that these two rival interpretations have weakened the Church’s identity and mission.

The consequence, says Bishop Nickless, has been a sort of dualism – “an either/or mentality and insistence in various areas of the Church’s life: either fidelity to doctrine or social justice work, either Latin or English, either personal conscience or the authority of the Church, either chant or contemporary music, either tradition or progress, either liturgy or popular piety, either conservative or liberal, either Mass or Adoration, either the Magisterium or theologians, either ecumenism or evangelization, either rubrics or personalization, either the Baltimore Catechism or ‘experience,’”…

For a clear example of this type of dualistic thinking, read through America magazine’s “Confessions of a Modern Nun,” by Ilia Delio. There, quoting Dominican Timothy Radcliffe, Delio describes American nuns as being either Concilium Catholics or Communio Catholics.

“Members of the Leadership Conference embrace modernity and the work of the council as the Holy Spirit breathing new life in the church,” writes Delio. “They fall under what Father Radcliffe identifies as the Concilium group, who focus on the Incarnation as the central point of renewal. Members of the Conference of Major Superiors, by contrast, are Communio Catholics, who emphasize communion through proclamation of the faith, a clear Catholic identity and the centrality of the cross. Members of the Conference of Major Superiors, by contrast, are Communio Catholics, who emphasize communion through proclamation of the faith, a clear Catholic identity and the centrality of the cross. (Concilium and Communio are the names of two periodicals founded in the postconciliar era. The first stressed conciliar reforms; the second stressed the continuity of the council documents with the community of the faithful through past centuries.) Thus, one group focuses on doxology and adoration (Communio), the other on practice and experience (Concilium). One sees Christ as gathering people into community (Communio); the other sees Christ as traversing boundaries (Concilium). The C.M.S.W.R. recently held its eucharistic congress under the title “Sacrifice of Enduring Love,” while the L.C.W.R. continues to work on systemic change. The former sees religious life as divine espousal with Christ; the latter sees Christ in solidarity with the poor and justice for the oppressed.”

“There can be no split, however, between the Church and her faith before and after the Council,” writes Bishop Nickless. “We must stop speaking of the ‘Pre-Vatican II’ and ‘Post-Vatican II’ Church, and stop seeing various characteristics of the Church as ‘pre’ and ‘post’ Vatican II. Only the ‘hermeneutic of reform,’ he says, is valid and “has borne and is bearing fruit.”

“The ‘spirit of Vatican II’ must be found only in the letter of the documents themselves,” writes Bishop Nickless. “The so-called ‘spirit’ of the Council…is a ghost or demon that must be exorcised if we are to proceed with the Lord’s work.”

Bishop Nickless goes on to state that, “we have sometimes lost sight of who we are and what we believe, and therefore have little to offer the world that so desperately needs the Gospel.”
“Our urgent need at this time is to reclaim and strengthen our understanding of the deposit of faith,” writes Nickless. He adds that our mission is two-fold – both within the Church (ad intra) and to the world (ad extra). He then sets forth a plan for “reclaiming and strengthening our faith, identity and culture as Catholics.”

That plan includes the following:

1. A renewal of reverence, love, adoration and devotion to the Most Blessed Sacrament within and outside of Mass, regular reception of the Sacrament of Reconciliation, and devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary.

2. Strengthening catechesis on every level, beginning with and focusing on adults, with Sacred Scripture and the Catechism of the Catholic Church as the primary sources of formation.

3. The protection and building up of holy families.

4. Fostering a culture where young people can more readily respond to the radical calls of ministerial priesthood and the consecrated life.

5. Acknowledging and embracing the missionary character of the Catholic Faith and the vocation of all Catholics to be, not only disciples, but also apostles.

Above all, Bishop Nickless calls the faithful to “great acts of renunciation.”

“In order to strengthen our devotion to Christ in the Holy Eucharist and worship God rightly, we need to renounce any attachment to how we worship currently. To improve the spiritual depth of how we perform the Church’s liturgy, we will need to renounce attachment to worldly expectations and long-standing habits. To spend more time adoring Christ in the Blessed Sacrament, we need to renounce attachments to how we currently use our time,” he writes. “To deepen our intimate love for God in our hearts and heads, we need to renounce attachments to whatever is not God that is filling our hearts and heads. To live in more intentional and holy Catholic families, we need to renounce attachment to distractions, sins, and imperfections that harm our domestic churches. To accept the divine plan god has for each of us, we need to renounce attachment to our own plans. To change the world for Christ, we need to renounce attachment to how we want the world to be for ourselves.”

It’s a fantastic read. You’ll find the pastoral letter in its entirety here.

Courage and Homosexuality

BY Gail Besse

 

Father Paul Check is the incoming director of the apostolate Courage.

Courage embraces Church teaching that same-sex attraction is not in itself sinful, but that homosexual acts are. The program aims to provide spiritual, moral and fraternal support to men and women who are attracted to members of the same sex, so that they can live chaste lives. Its affiliated group, Encourage, helps relatives and friends.

Register correspondent Gail Besse talked to Father Check, 48, of the Diocese of Bridgeport, Conn., about his plans for this spiritual apostolate, the challenges it faces, and the contributions of Father John Harvey, who founded Courage 28 years ago at the request of New York Cardinal Terence Cooke.

What are your immediate plans for the ministry?

I hope to continue doing what Father Harvey has done for decades; he has touched so many hearts and brought many souls to Christ.

The apostolate’s work is two-fold. One part is the support groups, Courage and Encourage, which are the A.A. and Al-Anon of Courage. The other part is education. Much of the director’s work is to go out to talk to priests, seminarians and lay people about same-sex attraction, and to encourage bishops to appoint a priest as chaplain to a chapter. I’m concerned that because Courage is not yet in every diocese, Catholics are going to Protestant groups, like Exodus, that do very good work in this spiritual ministry.

How can you most effectively expand the work?

I’m blessed to have had Father Harvey as an example. He’s been more than a mentor in this very complex matter; he’s been a good father to me. I’m inspired by the way he lives his priesthood. He’s worked steadfastly, with great charity, cheerfulness and graciousness in a field that people aren’t eager to enter. He brought a good intellect and true sense of Christian compassion to the ministry. He understands the reality of sin and has a great love for the soul that’s burdened and made miserable by it.

How did you get involved with Courage?

One of my favorite Gospel characters is the centurion (Luke 7:1-10), because for me, fidelity to the Church as the bride of Christ is everything. If the Church has asked me to do something, then I know it’s the will of God. In 2002, Bishop William Lori decided to bring Courage to the Diocese of Bridgeport. He asked me to establish the apostolate here, and I’ve been chaplain to our diocesan chapter since then.

How do Courage support groups work?

The apostolate is for those who struggle with same-sex attraction in different measure. Some are trying to leave the lifestyle, or to overcome addictions to pornography or masturbation. Many struggle with loneliness. It’s also for those who left the lifestyle or who were never in it, but who want to deepen their interior chastity and prayer life. We provide a forum where people can feel confident and peaceful about opening their hearts to others in strict confidentiality. No one knows the time or location of the meeting except the people there, and participants attend only after having been interviewed by the chaplain.

Did you have training in this field?

Well, the principal work of the priesthood is to help people live a holy life and get to heaven, so this is what I’ve been trying to do as a parish priest for 10 years. After the example of Christ the high priest, a priest’s vocation is to bring health to souls. Jesus said, “It is not those who are well who need a physician, but those who are sick” (Luke 5:31). So while SSA [same-sex attraction] is complex, and we must learn a lot from psychology, ultimately the goal of Courage is to produce saints.

I’ve been studying the psychological roots of same-sex attraction, and I have the advice and assistance of top practitioners in this field. My priestly graduate work was in moral theology; I earned a licentiate in sacred theology from the Atheneum [Pontifical University] of the Holy Cross in Rome. I’ve been teaching moral theology to seminarians and deacon candidates at St. John Fisher Seminary Residence for all of my priesthood. Also, serving as an officer in the U.S. Marine Corps before entering the seminary taught me a great deal about fatherhood, because my Marines were my sons.

You keep mentioning fatherhood. Can you explain in more detail?

One thing we see over and over in the background of men with same-sex attraction is that they’ve suffered first because of a deficit or void in their relationship with their father, and that has caused an estrangement. The main problem is not the acting out of genital sex; that’s a symptom.

The main problem was a loss of something these men were very eager for — the “shared delight” of a father-son relationship. They often suffer from what’s called “defensive detachment.” The boy knows something’s wrong with the relationship with his dad, so to defend himself, he puts up an emotional wall. That desire for masculine love, acceptance and affirmation doesn’t go away; it manifests itself in a distorted way when men seek homosexual relationships.

Courage members find the Church has great sympathy and compassion for their suffering.

What’s one main challenge you face in the laity’s reluctance to embrace Church teaching on same-sex activity?

The Church is clear and consistent within herself in all matters touching sexual intimacy. For example, marriage and procreation are intimately united in nature’s design. It’s a short step from separating procreation from marriage to separating sexual intimacy from marriage. Contraception makes this possible, and we can see that its widespread use, even among Catholics, has brought disorder to the human heart.

We have to return to an understanding of what it means to be human, particularly with regard to spousal love. If we’re not faithful to God’s design for our humanity, then many problems arise: sexual promiscuity, divorce, pornography, masturbation and same-sex activity.

Are there any other difficulties you face?

Regrettably, many of my brother priests don’t accept the Church’s teaching with regard to sexual morality: contraception and same-sex activity.

A number of them have espoused themselves to a bride, the Church, whom they love very much, but don’t trust her as being the authentic voice of Christ in the world. This produces a division in their hearts — and can confuse the souls entrusted to their care, who need the truth spoken with charity and conviction.

In your experience, what has most encouraged people with same-sex attraction?

People are relieved to know the condition is both treatable and preventable. Science has never determined there is a so-called “gay gene.” Those who have same-sex attraction can find peace, but they’ll never find it in a same-sex union.

You know, we admire virtue. We’re drawn to the virtues because we’re made for them. Courage holds up the human and theological virtues to its members and says, “It’s possible for you to live these, and this apostolate can help you.”

People see that chastity means real freedom when they appreciate why the Church teaches us to approach human love and physical intimacy with great respect and reverence — for our peace, our protection and the good of our immortal souls.

Gail Besse is based in Boston.

INFORMATION: Courage c/o Church of St. John The Baptist
210 West 31st Street
New York, NY 10001
CourageRC.net
NYCourage@aol.com
(212) 268-1010

 

 



About eBay | Announcements | Security Center | Resolution Center | eBay Toolbar | Policies | Government Relations | Site Map | Help
Copyright © 1995-2009 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
eBay official time